Monday, June 29, 2020

Pandemics: The Long View Approach



COVID 19 pandemic makes the perfect case for the concept of this Blog: a long, global view as opposed to the narrow, partisan, parochial, and short-term approach that has brought the world to this avoidable catastrophe. 

The last report from The Economist reveals the extent to which a crisis like this have been forecasted in advance... and ignored by press and politicians more interested in indefinite but more marketable problems such as global warming or inequality of income.  

Quote (bold is from this author):
"In february 2018 a panel of experts convened by the World Health Organisation (who) put together a list of diseases that posed big public-health risks but for which there were few or no countermeasures. It featured various well-recognised threats, including Ebola, sars, Zika and Rift Valley fever. But it also included “Disease X”. 
This illness, caused by a pathogen never before seen in humans, would, the panel said, emerge from animals somewhere in a part of the world where people had encroached on wildlife habitats. It would be more deadly than seasonal influenza but would spread just as easily between people. By hitching rides on travel and trade networks, it would journey beyond its continent of origin within weeks of its emergence. It would cause the world’s next big pandemic, and leave economic and social devastation in its wake. Indeed.
Less than two years after the report was published Disease X turned up. It began late last year in Wuhan, China, and the wider world became aware of it in January. It has now infected nearly 10m people and killed almost 500,000 of them. That death toll is also likely to reach seven figures before things are over. For Disease X now has a name: covid-19. 
I told you so 
Though perhaps the loudest, the who’s was not the only warning that something like this might happen. Moreover, some of the prophets, such as Peter Daszak, a disease ecologist who is head of an independent research organisation called the EcoHealth Alliance, specifically focused on the risk posed by bat-borne coronaviruses, as sars-cov-2, the cause of covid-19, has turned out to be. And the point of issuing those warnings was preparedness. 
With the correct systems in place a potential pandemic, spotted early, might be nipped in the bud. 
Instead, the world’s response to the new illness has been similar to its response to sars in 2002 and, after that, to h5n1 avian influenza in 2005. This is to move into a costly panic mode intended to slow the spread of the disease while scientists race to develop a vaccine. “This,” as Dr Daszak, observes wryly, “is not a plan.”

Zoonotic infectious diseases are as frequent as flu, as dangerous as HIV, and as frequently reported as the past five years of SARS, MERS, and so on. Yet, there has been more funding for finding (or implementing) "solutions" to long term, ill-defined menaces such as "global warming" or "climate change" than to actual and real epidemics such as SARS, MERS,m HIV, Ebola, to name some of COVID 19 predecessors.

Wild animals wet markets, unsanitary poultry, pig production, and distribution continues rampant and coexistence of human, bats, and civets remain as common in  Asia as it was before the current pandemic.



This is not science fiction. It's just willing ignorance of overwhelming and continuous scientific evidence. At a fraction of the cost of keeping 14 nuclear carriers and billions of dollars in defense spending for the remote eventuality of a WWIII-like confrontation in the indefinite future China, the US, and the EU could have already developed an effective vaccine and treatments.

Bill Gates warned in his TED talks  5 years before this disaster, only for conspiracy theorists to attack him incited by partisan propaganda networks on the Left and on the Right side of the spectrum 


Gates -whose only crime is being a self-made billionaire turned philanthropist for the past 20 years- has been leading actual efforts to fight pandemics out of his own pocket. Governments -US, EU, and China- have willingly ignored or even obstructed these and other efforts by hiding information until the crisis was already consuming the world.

This is not new. Henrik Ibsen wrote An Enemy of the People back in 1896 with the same story: short-sighted politicians serving special interests attacking science and blocking efforts to save lives.



It's belated time to look at social events with a long view, fact- and science-based perspective. 

Or suffer the consequences.

From Obama to Trump ... and back?: Beyond the Stereotype, the other side of America


For all his evident shortcomings, Trump holds a steady 30-35 % of the US vote. The stereotype of hillbillies, white supremacists, "systemic racists" and "white trash" can't account for more than a marginal part of all that.

Historian Victor Davis Hanson explains  the Trump voter phenomenon -not to be confused with Donald Trump's persona- in a much more nuanced way in his book The Case for Trump 

9 million Obama voters -from 2008 and 2012 elections- that voted for Trump in 2016 and might vote again for him. 
They are (1) small town, rural voters; (2) small business, family-owned and operated, (3) college-educated white and black, (4) latino american, self-employed immigrants.
 They have common immediate requirements such as:
  1. Lower taxes
  2. Keeping their private insurance
  3. Keeping their access to charter schools
  4. Repealing the state tax that kills multi-generational farm families
  5. Rejection of "identity politics" and embracing "Americanism", melting-pot approach to cultural integration (speak English, be self-sufficient, raise traditional families values)
  6. Pragmatic, non-ideological voters: "it's the economy, stupid" criterion first.
Here are some samples from focus groups held by WSJ and ABC news following them in their towns for the past two years:

Texas:

Iowa:


Georgia: Black voters


Obama voters for Trump


A reality check can help assess the "two Americas" -rural and urban- trends and see beyond political stereotypes and pundit talk what the actual voters vote for.

Even if Trump loses in an anti-Trump "tsunami", these voices and voters must be heard and taken into account to understand why.

Sunday, June 28, 2020

Biden's Presidency: Stormy Weather Ahead


Thanks to Trump's "Katrina" handling of the pandemic and race riots, Joe Biden could likely become the next US President.  

Aged, uninspiring, and lacking a strong base of his own, Biden would have a hard time controlling the nihilistic Far Left that menaces with taking over cities and establish their own "Occupy..." communes around major cities to force their agenda.



The problem with this perspective is not so much the badness of the agenda -a smorgasbord of failed, half-baked 1970s ideas- but their lack of direction in a moment of extreme economic and social turmoil. Think of a 1- or 2-year Katrina on steroids, with over 250.000 deaths and economic paralysis at 15% unemployment.

The party of no ideas (Democrats) could take over a bizarre one-term presidency of the party of (very) bad ideas.

A Biden presidency could usher a "malaise", Jimmy Carter-like era of higher taxes, unemployment, recession, and social turmoil.

Hope is not a strategy. Fear neither.



Will the economic vote trump (pun intended) the Katrina-like handling of the pandemic and social turmoil?  Swing states are up for grabs between two (very) bad options. 

Monday, June 15, 2020

Trump fatigue? From Watergate to Waterloo


Like in every presidential election year, it's harvest time in American politics. 

As of June 2020, it seems that chickens are coming home to roost for President Trump. His past 3 months have been a dangerous, self-defeating demonstration of poor management and even poorer leadership and the polls are starting to show an ominous trend.

What seemed a few months ago very likely reelection is slipping away from Trump as a consequence of a powerful mix of economic downturn, erratic pandemic management, and an ill-advised, touch Nixonian "law and order" response to racial tension and protests.

Trump took for granted that a sharp recovery before November would be enough to stay in office regardless of his behavior (as he once proclaimed during his election campaign he could shot a person in 5th Avenue and get away with it)



Trump based his reelection strategy on that factor, turning up his cultural war rhetoric to please its unconditional base. He seems to be betting that 40% of the vote can re-elect him regardless of the rest.  The electoral map and polls increasingly dispute that assumption.

The problem with this "silver bullet" strategy is that Trump has alienated almost all other voting groups to an extreme that looks hard to revert. 

Piling up death tolls, lockdowns, abrupt and induced recession, and racial strife, there are growing signs of "Trump fatigue". Trump himself looks increasingly out of touch with reality like his mentor Richard Nixon during the Watergate days

Nixon's farewell speech comes to mind. He discovered too late that hate-based politics can be self-defeating:



Instead of reaching out to decisive voters and seeking a middle ground, Trump looks increasingly absorbed in being his own campaign chief and distracted on blowing dog whistles on irritating issues such as Confederate monuments and rallies in defiance of pandemic guidance and racial sensitivities. 

Trump's bet on partisan polarization is clearly backfiring.

This election could not only rend Trump a one-term president but cost GOP both houses of Congress 

The forecasts for the Presidential election show anti-Trump waves forming even in formerly safe states



And the possibility of losing control of the Senate grows








This would be a catastrophic farewell for a President that promised a string of "wins". A ticket from Watergate to Waterloo not only for Trump but a potential reversal of fortunes for the entire GOP and whichever "win" he might have claimed so far.


This is clearly not good for Trump and his supporters, but -much more importantly- it might be not good for the economy and the country.

Given the current Democratic party platform's sharp turn towards the progressive Left, a Biden-Warren Presidency would mean big government, tax-heavy solutions could delay or even destroy what is already a hard but promising recovery.

Also, it would swing the cultural wars pendulum from Trump's Tea Party to Warren's anti-business, BLM's identity politics, and Biden's unions' protectionism rather than calming them.

That might be Trump's presidency's worst legacy. A full opposite of all his presidency tried to accomplish. And a huge step backward for sensible pro-growth and the free market,  free trade policies that are the only way for the US to come out of a mountain of 30 trillion debt without a major recession.

Neither the economy nor Trump seems to be able to avoid it.

Perhaps the economy can make it -after all this is America-.

How about trying to be more like the best of it?

Time for Civility


"Treat everybody well when you are going up, because is more than likely you'll meet them again in your way down"  Argentinian saying

During these days of multiple crises and social unrest, a serious lack of a key component of presidential leadership becomes self-evident: civility.

What is civility? You can tell it when you see it. Just looking at the numerous positive examples such as the one that starts this entry: President Obama honoring Presidents Bush 43 and 41 in the White House.

Or you can look at the President's Club -where all our living presidents get together to seek advice and support in a job that has no previous training- 



Historically, US Presidents have treated their predecessors with respect and civility. That is true for Abraham Lincoln naming his former primary rival Seward Secretary of State and forming a famous "team of rivals" in his cabinet during a Civil War

Or President Obama doing the same by appointing former rival Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.


Or finally, all presidents paying respect to Bush 41 at his funeral. 



Or the traditional roasts at the White House Correspondents Dinner

All Presidents have followed this bipartisan American tradition that reminds us all that we are the United States and not a loose Confederation of warring states and parties.

President Trump is the only President that has largely abandoned the tradition of civility and attacked his predecessors from the bully pulpit. 

This is unacceptable, substandard uncivil behavior.

The multiple crises we face as a nation and as part of our shared world require a united United States and a President that sets the tone by example.

Think for a moment that inevitably every President in a Republic becomes a former President.

Think for a moment of Jimmy Carter -who still prays for Trump as President-